Post by Judd Sergeant IV on Jan 11, 2007 13:23:46 GMT -5
So I was talking with Billy last night about Jamie's post in our tribal thread about who to sit out at the next challenge. Jamie put up a post with a poll that we were apparently all supposed to vote on for someone to sit out, but he didn't even place a vote. Billy and I saw this, and personally thought it was one of the most stupid things we'd ever seen in an ORG.
Why would we single out a member of our tribe if we don't have to? It's not even so much the fact that we weren't even sure if we had to sit someone out (we do), but the fact that why not simply let someone volunteer, so we end up with the best tribal dynamic? Brianna volunteered to sit out, and that seems to make the most sense. If we ended up voting for Brooke to sit out, but she could make it, and Brianna couldn't, then we'd be out two strong members.
I don't know, we thought it was stupid, but neither of us really wanted to say flat out, "Hey, that's stupid," so we both just said something nicer, and Jamie may have taken Billy's comment the wrong way. Hopefully not, we don't need tension in a tribe this small, we need focus.
Why would we single out a member of our tribe if we don't have to? It's not even so much the fact that we weren't even sure if we had to sit someone out (we do), but the fact that why not simply let someone volunteer, so we end up with the best tribal dynamic? Brianna volunteered to sit out, and that seems to make the most sense. If we ended up voting for Brooke to sit out, but she could make it, and Brianna couldn't, then we'd be out two strong members.
I don't know, we thought it was stupid, but neither of us really wanted to say flat out, "Hey, that's stupid," so we both just said something nicer, and Jamie may have taken Billy's comment the wrong way. Hopefully not, we don't need tension in a tribe this small, we need focus.
